| 翻訳と辞書 |
| NLRB v. Fansteel Metallurgical Corp. ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
NLRB v. Fansteel Metallurgical Corp.
''National Labor Relations Board v. Fansteel Metallurgical Corporation'', 306 U.S. 240 (1939), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the National Labor Relations Board had no authority to order an employer to reinstate workers fired after a sit-down strike, even if the employer's illegal actions triggered that strike.
== Background ==
In the summer of 1936, workers at Fansteel Metallurgical Corporation's plant near Chicago, Illinois, attempted to form a union. Fansteel infiltrated a labor spy into the union, who committed espionage against the union. Although the union attempted to meet several times with the plant superintendent to negotiate a contract, each time the employer refused. The employer established a company union in an attempt to weaken support for the independent union, but this failed. On February 17, 1937, the frustrated union announced a sit-down strike and seized a portion of the plant.〔Gross, p. 24.〕 The employer won an injunction ordering the union men to vacate the premises, which they ignored.〔 An attempt by sheriff's deputies to eject the men on February 19 failed, but a second attempt on February 26 was successful.〔〔"Six Hurt in Battle as Sheriff Tries to Oust 'Sit-Downs'," ''New York Times,'' February 20, 1937; "Fansteel Rejects Terms, Bars Gov. Horner's Proposal of Tacit Recognition of C.I.O. Union," ''New York Times,'' February 26, 1937; "Gas Barrage Ousts Fansteel Strikers in a Short Battle," ''New York Times,'' February 27, 1937.〕 The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) held on March 14, 1938, that Fansteel had to reinstate 90 of the workers because the company had violated the Act first (precipitating the sit-down strike).〔〔Brisbin, p. 57.〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「NLRB v. Fansteel Metallurgical Corp.」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|